Search Site
Menu
7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 240 | Pleasanton, California 94566

With the advent of companies like Uber and Lyft, the number ofon-demand service companies has been increasing dramatically. However, lawsuits filed against these companies regarding the status of their workers and overtime may bring a stop to the way that they do business. Lawsuits against the rideshare companies Lyft and Uber are already pending, and now more on-demand companies are being sued that utilize similar business models.

On-Demand Service Companies

Most recently, the grocery delivery service Instacart, housecleaning company Homejoy, and delivery service companies Postmates and Try Caviar have all had lawsuits filed against them in California’s Northern District. The way that these companies operate is simple: the companies use an app on a smartphone for their customers to order services and have them delivered to their home. The people providing the service, whether it’s shopping, home cleaning, or delivery, drive in their own vehicles, and the company takes a part of the proceeds of the transaction.

On-Demand Service Company Lawsuits

All of the lawsuits currently pending against on-demand service companies claim that the workers that provide the service have been misclassified as “independent contractors” when they should be classified as employees. As such, the employees should be entitled to benefits, like overtime, which they do not currently get.

Thousands of people currently identified as independent contractors could be affected by these lawsuits.Instacart has over 1,000 people shopping for groceries, and up to 10,000 people could be included in the lawsuit. The lawsuit is looking to include “everyone who ‘performed grocery delivery service’ for Instacart from Jan. 1, 2012 to the present.”

Two lawsuits have been filed against the home cleaning on-demand serviceHomejoy. The first lawsuit is similar to others that want to identify people as employees. The other lawsuit claims that the company fails to pay minimum wage or overtime, and it requires the independent contractors to pay for their own business-related expenses. The Homejoy lawsuits claim that “cleaners are an integral part of Homejoy’s business of providing cleaning services, among other services, to its customers.” However, the company’s terms of service claim that it is merely a “venue” or a “platform” that connects consumers to cleaners in their area and not an actual cleaning service provider.

Other On-Demand Service Lawsuits

In the other on-demand service lawsuits against Uber and Lyft, the judges in the case could not conclude whether the companies are more than simply software platforms. They deferred to a jury to determine whether the independent contractors should be considered employees.

However, an attorney for the plaintiffs in the case against Uber claims that “When companies have control over their workers, when they get to dictate how they should act, when they get to decide whether they can work or not work, those are employees . . . So these workers are entitled to the protections of the law, to get their expenses reimbursed, to be guaranteed overtime, to make [at least] minimum wage.”

Call a California Employment Attorney

As more on-demand service companies face lawsuits about their employees, it could have an effect on your business. If you or someone that you know has questions regarding employment law in Pleasanton, Alameda County, or the Tri-Valley area, let the experienced employment law attorneys atGarcia & Gurney help. Call the office orcontact us today for a confidential consultation of your case.

Lyft

 

Contact us

Please fill out the form below and one of our attorneys will contact you.

Quick Contact Form

Awards/Affiliations
Events and News
  • "New Laws for 2018November 15, 2017"

  • "E-Contracts & E-Signatures: Benefits and PitfallsOctober 18, 2017"

  • "Protecting your IPAugust 9, 2017"

  • "Medical Marijuana & Employment: The Do’s and Don’tsJune 28, 2017"

  • "Medical Marijuana & Employment: The Do’s and Don’tsApril 10, 2017"

Client Testimonials
  • "Melinda Garcia came very highly recommended by two colleagues who raved about her expertise and assertiveness. She and her team are extremely responsive and help us navigate the legal challenges of our consulting business. We're thrilled to have Melinda on our side!"

  • "Melinda Garcia was wonderful to work with. She is an outstanding listener and has a great memory for details and personal information.... which makes one feel very comfortable and welcome. I would highly recommend her to anyone not only because of her outstanding abilities but because of the compassion she eludes in dealing with an individual's issues/concerns."

  • "Highly recommend! I was in need of urgent help with an employment matter and Melinda Garcia came through for me the same day. She fit me in for a consultation within hours of my call and read my documents prior to our meeting. She was thorough, attentive to my needs, knowledgeable, professional and above all very comforting."

  • "Melinda Garcia provided me excellent advice in resolving an employment agreement related to an acquisition of the company I worked for. She is very knowledgeable, asked me what I wanted to achieve with her services, provided excellent service to achieve those goals, and was very cognizant of fees. I recommend her for employment related services."

  • "Melinda Garcia provided excellent guidance with an employment/compensation case. Her knowledge of employment law, and strong negotiation skills, brought the case to a successful conclusion."

  • "Melinda Garcia has done an excellent job assisting us as we established our small business. From incorporation to contract negotiations, Melinda Garcia and her staff were outstanding"