A December trial date has been scheduled in Los Angeles federal court for a lawsuit in which a British songwriter is alleging that country music star Keith Urban stole his band’s name for the trademark on his guitar lesson package that is being sold on the Home Shopping Network and online. Peter Beckett filed his trademark violation complaint earlier this year and alleges that Keith Urban is being “fraudulent and malicious” for using “Player” in the name of his product.
Facts of the Complaint
The case revolves around the sale of the “Keith Urban Player” acoustic guitar kit that includes a signature guitar, instructional DVD, and other items for playing music. Mr. Beckett alleges that Keith Urban stole the name of his band, Player, after the band played its 1978 hit “Baby Come Back” on an episode of the television soap opera show General Hospital earlier this year.
The lawsuit also names the Home Shopping Network and Guitar Monkey Entertainment as defendants in the case. Mr. Beckett claims that the “defendants’ use of the trade name and trademark Player . . . are likely to deceive and will continue to deceive the consuming public. Defendants knew, recklessly disregarded, or reasonably should have known that such packaging, advertising, marketing, and promotion was untrue and/or misleading.”
Mr. Beckett claims that eventually consumers will assume that Keith Urban is the artist behind his band’s hit song and not the Player group if an injunction is not filed to stop the sale of his product. He alleges that “if not for his marriage to Nicole Kidman and if not for his appearance as a judge on the tail end of the now-canceled ‘American Idol,’ defendant Urban’s fame would be limited to country fans for just a few more years” and is using the Player name for more recognition.
Moreover, Mr. Beckett claims that the deceptive use of the name will cause his band irreparable injury that cannot even be calculated in monetary terms. He is asking for at least one million dollars in the lawsuit. Keith Urban’s representatives have refused to comment on the ongoing litigation and the trial has been set for December 15.
California Trademark Law
California uses the Model State Trademark Law to define and determine when a trademark is created, used, appropriated, and violated. Under the law, a trademark is any word, name, symbol, or device that is used to identify or distinguish a particular good or service from those manufactured and sold by others. When a trademark is violated, it is considered “diluting” the mark, either by blurring or tarnishment. Blurring a trademark means that a person is using a similar mark to create confusion in products, and tarnishing a trademark means that a person is using a trademark to harm the reputation of another.
Call Our Office Now
At Garcia & Gurney, A Law Corporation we understand the importance of trademarks and other intellectual property when it comes to your business. Our intellectual property attorneys have been successfully representing clients in Pleasanton, Alameda County, and the Tri-Valley area with their trademark claims and can help you with you legal needs, too. Call the office or contact us today for a personalized review of your case.
"Melinda Garcia came very highly recommended by two colleagues who raved about her expertise and assertiveness. She and her team are extremely responsive and help us navigate the legal challenges of our consulting business. We're thrilled to have Melinda on our side!"
"Melinda Garcia was wonderful to work with. She is an outstanding listener and has a great memory for details and personal information.... which makes one feel very comfortable and welcome. I would highly recommend her to anyone not only because of her outstanding abilities but because of the compassion she eludes in dealing with an individual's issues/concerns."
"Highly recommend! "
"Melinda Garcia provided me excellent advice in resolving an employment agreement related to an acquisition of the company I worked for. She is very knowledgeable, asked me what I wanted to achieve with her services, provided excellent service to achieve those goals, and was very cognizant of fees. I recommend her for employment related services."
"Melinda Garcia provided excellent guidance with an employment/compensation case. Her knowledge of employment law, and strong negotiation skills, brought the case to a successful conclusion."
"Melinda Garcia has done an excellent job assisting us as we established our small business. From incorporation to contract negotiations, Melinda Garcia and her staff were outstanding"